The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to interfere in the election again
Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.
The American public deserves to know what the presidential candidates plan to do about the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Sandra Day O'Connor was the last justice who held elective office, as a state senator in Arizona. In today's court, every justice ā other than Elena Kagan ā has been a federal appellate judge. Kagan ...
Salon on MSN3d
John Robertsā MAGA conversion: How Donald Trump remade the Supreme Court in his imageSince he was appointed Supreme Court chief justice by George ... but that was issued unsigned.ā In Fischer v. United ...
3don MSN
Most states require some sort of high school civics instruction. But with surveys showing that a third of American adults can ...
United States and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court. The decision in the former extended immunity to the president for "official acts," while the latter sharply curtailed ...
Clever railroad lawyers had the answer: Simply persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to declare corporate personhood, which would bring corporations the protections of the new 14th Amendment. Never mind ...
TikTok is asking a federal court to stop a law that could ban the social media platform in the U.S. But two studies suggest TikTok blocks info critical of China, and a new analysis argues the firm is ...
He observed that the Apex court's judgement reinforces the federal structure envisaged in the Constitution and provides an important source of revenue for the states.
The American public deserves to know what the presidential candidates plan to do about the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback